Deleting from LbNA - was NJ Letterbox--did we find one that's been archived?

2 messages in this thread | Started on 2005-08-18

Deleting from LbNA - was NJ Letterbox--did we find one that's been archived?

From: Rick in Boca (rick_in_boca@bigfoot.com) | Date: 2005-08-18 14:13:17 UTC

Why not change the LbNA "Delete" function to act more as an archive
function? These clues don't take up a lot of index space, do they?

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> I don't find this letterbox in letterboxing.org or in our
> archives either. It's not uncommon for members to delete
> boxes that they believe are missing. Sometimes they show
> up again later.

Fwd: Deleting from LbNA - was NJ Letterbox--did we find one that's been archived?

From: trishkri (trishkri@yahoo.com) | Date: 2005-08-18 14:26:27 UTC

The clues are considered a form of intellectual property. The delete
function could be changed to require an alternative of "permanently
delete" or "delete but archive." Some people delete their boxes from
the site but don't want a record of them kept there.

Trish
One of the LbNA wm's

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Rick in Boca"
wrote:
> Why not change the LbNA "Delete" function to act more as an archive
> function? These clues don't take up a lot of index space, do they?
>
> --- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> > I don't find this letterbox in letterboxing.org or in our
> > archives either. It's not uncommon for members to delete
> > boxes that they believe are missing. Sometimes they show
> > up again later.